Da. Wing et al., A COMPARISON OF MISOPROSTOL AND PROSTAGLANDIN E(2) GEL FOR PREINDUCTION CERVICAL RIPENING AND LABOR INDUCTION, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 172(6), 1995, pp. 1804-1810
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of intra
vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E(2) (dinoprost
one) gel for preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor. ST
UDY DESIGN: One hundred thirty-five patients with indications for indu
ction of labor and unfavorable cervices were randomly assigned to rece
ive either intravaginal misoprostol or intracervical dinoprostone. Fif
ty microgram tablets of misoprostol were placed in the posterior vagin
al fornix every 3 hours for a maximum of six doses. Prostaglandin E(2)
in gel form, 0.5 mg, was placed into the endocervix every 6 hours for
a maximum of three doses. Medication was not given after either spont
aneous rupture of membranes or beginning of active labor. RESULTS: Amo
ng 135 patients enrolled, 68 received misoprostol and 67 received dino
prostone. The average interval from start of induction to vaginal deli
very was shorter in the misoprostol group (903.3 +/- 482.1 minutes) th
an in the dinoprostone group (1410.9 +/- 869.1 minutes) (p < 0.001). O
xytocin augmentation of labor occurred more often in the dinoprostone
group (65.7%) than in the misoprostol group (33.8%) (P < 0.001). There
were no significant differences between routes or delivery, Ten of th
e misoprostol-treated patients (14.7%) and 13 of the dinoprostone-trea
ted patients (19.4%) had cesarean deliveries. There was a higher preva
lence of tachysystole (six or more uterine contractions in a 10-minute
window for two consecutive 10-minute periods) in the misoprostol grou
p (36.7%) than in the dinoprostone group (11.9%) (p < 0.001). However,
there were no significant differences in frequency of uterine hyperst
imulation or hypertonus. There was a higher prevalence of meconium pas
sage in the misoprostol group (27.9%) than in the dinoprostone group (
10.5%) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in frequency of
abnormal fetal heart rate tracings, 1- or 5-minute Apgar scores < 7,
neonatal resuscitations, or admissions to the neonatal intensive care
unit between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginally administered misop
rostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and induction of la
bor; however when given at this dosage, it is associated with a higher
prevalence of tachysystole and meconium passage than is dinoprostone.
Further studies to compare the safety of misoprostol to that of dinop
rostone and to delineate an optimal dosing regimen for misoprostol are
needed.