Neuropsychological outcome at 1 year postinjury was examined prospecti
vely in representative groups of 436 adult head-injured participants a
nd 121 general-trauma control participants. A comprehensive battery of
neuropsychological measures was administered. The head-injured group
performed significantly worse than the trauma controls on most measure
s (p < .01). However, the magnitude and pervasiveness of the impairmen
ts depended on the severity of the head injury. This study provides in
formation about expected ranges of impairment as a function of differe
nt severity levels and appropriate comparison values. The findings rai
se important questions about clinically held beliefs of differential s
ensitivity of neuropsychological measures. Furthermore, the substantia
l variability in outcome observed underscores the importance of examin
ing factors that seem to exacerbate or mitigate the effects of brain d
amage.