Because gerontological studies often need to rely on the use of proxy
respondents, the comparability of proxy and self-respondents is of par
ticular interest. However, it is often impossible to evaluate response
agreement between proxy and self-respondents because the necessary da
ta are not available. This study addresses the problem by using a mode
l of health status to evaluate differences between proxy and self-resp
ondents regarding the conceptualization of health status. The model in
cluded three dimensions of physical health: chronic illness, functiona
l limitations, and subjective health. Three groups of respondents who
differ regarding proxy status and/or physical health status were compa
red. A subset of matched self-respondents (n = 146) was selected to be
comparable in objective health status to respondents who have proxies
(n = 140). The third group consisted of physically healthier self-res
pondents (n = 1,425). Data came from the Study of Well-Being of Older
People in Cleveland, OH. No support was found for the expectation that
proxies and self-respondents would weight objective health informatio
n differently when providing summary statements of subjective health.
The results suggest that proxies rely on a conceptualization similar t
o self-respondents when providing information about another person's h
ealth.