Pa. Abrams, IMPLICATIONS OF DYNAMICALLY VARIABLE TRAITS FOR IDENTIFYING, CLASSIFYING, AND MEASURING DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES, The American naturalist, 146(1), 1995, pp. 112-134
This article discusses how the presence of dynamic change in traits af
fecting interspecific interactions changes the ways in which interacti
ons between species are distinguished, classified, and measured. The p
revalence of models lacking any trait dynamics has led to methods of i
dentifying and measuring indirect effects that are not valid when phen
otypically or evolutionarily plastic traits affect interspecific inter
actions. When traits are dynamic, the number of links in a dynamic mod
el can no longer be used to distinguish direct and indirect effects, a
nd classifying interactions by a single sign denoting effect on equili
brium density becomes problematic. The presence of trait dynamics also
changes the interpretation of manipulative experiments that have been
used to measure indirect effects. Because both traits and population
densities can transmit indirect effects, a given ordered series of spe
cies will often transmit several indirect effects, which may have oppo
site signs. Because some traits can change very rapidly, dynamic equat
ions describing population growth rates may often include the densitie
s of species that interact indirectly with the given species. Some of
the conceptual problems in comparing magnitudes of direct and indirect
effects are illustrated by simple models of a three-species food chai
n. Different methods of measuring effect magnitudes can give different
conditions for when direct effects are larger than indirect effects.
Other terminology related to indirect effects, including interaction m
odification and higher-order interaction, is critically discussed. Giv
en the present paucity of information about trait dynamics, it may be
premature to attempt to compare magnitudes of direct and indirect effe
cts.