Mr. Boyett et al., IONIC BASIS OF THE CHRONOTROPIC EFFECT OF ACETYLCHOLINE ON THE RABBITSINOATRIAL NODE, Cardiovascular Research, 29(6), 1995, pp. 867-878
Objective: The aim was to study the ionic basis of the chronotropic ef
fects of bath applied acetylcholine and vagal stimulation on the rabbi
t sinoatrial node. Methods: The chronotropic effect of bath applied ac
etylcholine was measured in single cells and small multicellular prepa
rations from the rabbit sinoatrial node and the chronotropic effect of
postganglionic vagal stimulation was measured in the intact sinoatria
l node. The roles of the hyperpolarisation activated current, i(f), th
e acetylcholine activated potassium current, i(K,ACh), and the L-type
calcium current, i(Ca), were investigated by blocking the currents wit
h 1-2 mM Cs+ or 10(-6) M UL-FS49, 0.2-1.0 mM Ba2+, and 6 X 10(-6) M ni
fedipine, respectively. Results: Under control conditions, small multi
cellular preparations were approximately two orders of magnitude less
sensitive to bath applied acetylcholine than single cells. However, af
ter block of acetylcholinesterase by eserine in small multicellular pr
eparations the sensitivities of the two types of preparation were appr
oximately the same. Block of i(f) either had no discernible effect or
increased the chronotropic effect of bath applied acetylcholine on sin
gle cells or small multicellular preparations, whereas partial block o
f i(K,ACh) reduced it substantially. Similarly, block of i(f) did not
suppress the initial slowing of spontaneous action potentials by vagal
stimulation, whereas partial block of i(K,ACh) reduced it. The hyperp
olarisation of the arrested sinoatrial node in response to vagal stimu
lation was also substantially reduced by block of i(K,ACh). Partial bl
ock of i(Ca) caused large decreases in the action potential amplitude
and maximum diastolic potential, but little decrease in the rate of sp
ontaneous action potentials, and therefore did not mimic the effect of
acetylcholine. Conclusions: The chronotropic effects of bath applied
acetylcholine and vagal stimulation are not principally the result of
a suppression of i(f) or i(Ca), whereas the activation of i(K,ACh) may
play an important role.