New foraminiferal evidence from two boreholes on the paleoshelf and sl
ope of western Great Bahama Bank has wide-ranging implications for und
erstanding formation and evolution of carbonate-platform margins. The
new data, abundant well-preserved planktic foraminifera, were obtained
by disaggregating samples from intercalated pelagic layers and select
ed parts of thick hemipelagic limestone. Earlier efforts to obtain bio
stratigraphic ages identified six biostratigraphic units in each boreh
ole, provided biozonal age alternatives for both holes, and resulted i
n different Pliocene biozones between them. The new data define six un
its in one hole and seven in the other, bracket the biozones present a
nd their ages, indicate different sedimentation rates, and show that w
ithin the limits of biostratigraphic resolution the biozones are corre
lative between the holes. Most importantly, the revised ages show that
the paleoshelf borehole probably penetrated the late Miocene rather t
han middle Miocene. The oldest unit is on the paleoshelf and the young
est (uppermost Pliocene) is on the slope. Between the holes, the strat
igraphic interval spans the temporal interval from an inferred maximum
of similar to 10.2 Ma to a minimum of similar to 1.6 Ma. Although the
biozones range sequentially from the Neogloboquadrina acostaensis (N1
6) Zone to the basal part of the Globorotalia truncatulinoides truncat
ulinoides (N22) Zone (Globorotalia crassaformis viola Subzone), absenc
e of key species indicates that deposition was discontinuous. Numerous
periods of erosion and/or nondeposition are inferred, the largest of
which is a condensed section/ hiatus (similar to 1.2 Myr) above the pa
leoslope Miocene/Pliocene boundary. In addition, the late Pliocene Glo
borotalia tosaensis tosaensis (N21) Zone is not recognized on the slop
e. Its absence is consistent with a widespread regional unconformity.
Sedimentation rates and depths of series boundaries vary widely in bot
h holes. The paleoslope Miocene/Pliocene boundary lies at similar to 5
40 m below top of the hole. The lower/upper Pliocene boundary is place
d at or near 444 m. Position of the Pliocene/ Pleistocene boundary is
less certain but is within the top 382 m of the hole. Its placement an
ywhere within this interval is a reasonable assessment considering an
exceptionally high rate of sedimentation ( similar to 562 m/Myr; 168.6
m interval, based on topmost foraminiferal sample; 1.9-1.6 Ma). As ex
pected, the lowest sedimentation rate occurs in the condensed section
overlying the Miocene/Pliocene boundary ( similar to 5 m/Myr, 9.5 m, 5
.3-4.1 Ma). The paleoshelf Miocene/Pliocene boundary lies below a hiat
al condensed section (295-278 m below top of the hole) that has a grea
ter sedimentation rate ( similar to 89 m/Myr, 17.7 m, 5.5-5.3 Ma) than
that at the slope. The lower/upper Pliocene boundary is placed at or
near a depth of 236 m, and the Pliocene/Pleistocene boundary lies with
in the top 113 m of the hole. Sedimentation rates on the shelf range f
rom similar to 15 m/Myr above the condensed section (22.9 m, 5.3-3.8 M
a) to a late Pliocene high of similar to 183 m/Myr (54.9 m interval, b
ased on the point at which the age-depth line crosses the 1.9 Myr mark
between the topmost two fossiliferous samples; 2.2-1.9 Ma).