Ve. Forbes et al., INTRAPOPULATION VARIABILITY IN SUBLETHAL RESPONSE TO HEAVY-METAL STRESS IN SEXUAL AND ASEXUAL GASTROPOD POPULATIONS, Functional ecology, 9(3), 1995, pp. 477-484
1. Asexual species have been described by some to be more broadly tole
rant of environmental stresses (i.e. to have general purpose genotypes
) and by others to be more responsive to environmental stresses (i.e.
to exhibit narrower tolerance distributions to environmental perturbat
ions) in comparison to their sexual relatives. 2. We examined the subl
ethal response of asexual and sexual gastropod populations of the fami
ly Hydrobiidae to cadmium exposure to determine: whether populations r
ank consistently in mean and variance of growth rate when reared in di
fferent environments; whether the variance in growth rate within popul
ations alters in response to stress; and whether growth rates within g
enetically uniform clones are less variable than growth rates within s
exually outcrossed populations. 3. We found that, in addition to reduc
ing mean growth rate in all populations, exposure to cadmium increased
the variability in growth rate within populations and altered the ran
king of both means and variances among populations. 4. The average int
raclonal variability in growth in the parthenogenetic species Potamopy
rgus antipodarum was comparable to the average intrapopulation variabi
lity in growth within the closely related but sexually reproducing Hyd
robia species. Our results indicate that environmental toxicants, such
as cadmium, can alter the relative performance of these potentially c
ompeting species. 5. Our results are of broad relevance to the examina
tion of phenotype variance and its partitioning between genetic and en
vironmental sources of variation. 6. Non-genetic variation was the mos
t important component of the total phenotypic variance in growth rate
within these gastropod populations. 7. In addition, the assumption fre
quently applied in the development of toxicity test protocols, that un
iformity in phenotypic traits (i.e. response to toxicant exposure) is
tightly coupled to genotypic uniformity, is not supported by our resul
ts.