R. Harper et al., A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF LOW-DOSE AND CONVENTIONAL-DOSE THIAZIDE DIURETIC ON INSULIN ACTION IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH NIDDM, Diabetologia, 38(7), 1995, pp. 853-859
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
In conventional doses, thiazide diuretics impair glucose tolerance and
decrease insulin sensitivity, making them an unpopular choice for tre
ating diabetic patients with hypertension. However, use of low-dose th
iazide diuretics may avoid the adverse metabolic effects seen with con
ventional doses. In a double-blind, randomised crossover study we asse
ssed peripheral and hepatic insulin action in 13 hypertensive non-insu
lin-dependent diabetic patients after a 6-week placebo run-in and foll
owing two 12-week treatment periods with either low (1.25 mg) or conve
ntional (5.0 mg) dose bendrofluazide. There were no differences betwee
n doses in their effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Ben
drofluazide 1.25 mg had significantly less effect on serum potassium,
uric acid, fasting glucose and HbA(1c) concentrations than the 5.00 mg
dose. Exogenous glucose infusion rates required to maintain euglycaem
ia were significantly different between doses (p < 0.05) with conventi
onal-dose bendrofluazide worsening peripheral insulin resistance compa
red to baseline (23.8 +/- 2.9 vs 27.3 +/- 3.5 mu mol . kg(-1) . min(-1
), p < 0.05) and low-dose bendrofluazide producing no change compared
to baseline (26.8 +/- 3.6 vs 27.3 +/- 3.5 mu mol . kg(-1) . min(-1), p
= NS). Postabsorptive endogenous glucose production was higher on tre
atment with bendrofluazide 5.0 mg compared to 1.25 mg (11.7 +/- 10.5 v
s 10.2 +/- 0.3 mu mol . kg(-1) . min(-1), p < 0.05) and suppressed to
a lesser extent following insulin (4.0 +/- 0.7 vs 2.0 +/- 0.4 mu mol .
kg(-1) . min(-1), p < 0.05). Treatment with bendrofluazide 5.0 mg inc
reased postabsorptive endogenous glucose production compared to baseli
ne (11.7 +/- 0.5 vs 10.6 +/- 0.4 mu mol . kg(-1) . min(-1), p < 0.05)
whereas bendrofluazide 1.25 mg did not (10.2 +/- 0.3 vs 10.6 +/- 0.4 m
u mol . kg(-1) min(-1), p = NS). At a dose of 1.25 mg bendrofluazide i
s as effective as conventional doses but has less adverse metabolic ef
fects. In contrast to conventional doses which worsen both hepatic and
peripheral insulin resistance, low-dose bendrofluazide has no effect
on insulin action in non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects.