A major impetus for this study was recent literature that assumed that
nurses' definitions of euthanasia and consequent opinions on decision
making are unproblamatic. The purpose of this study was to identify n
urses' definitions of and attitudes towards euthanasia. Ten semi-struc
tured interviews were conducted with nurses working in a variety of cl
inical practice settings. The majority of nurses could distinguish bet
ween active and passive euthanasia, but it was only in terms of active
euthanasia that the debate was seen as significant. It was considered
that the term passive euthanasia, particularly in relation to withdra
wal of treatment, has served to confuse the real debate centring aroun
d active euthanasia. Only two participants were in favour of active eu
thanasia, but emphasized the need for 'a community of shared responsib
ility' in decision making. The major finding of the study was the comm
itment of all participants to caring for and ensuring the comfort of t
he dying patient. The concepts of ordinary and extraordinary forms of
treatment and heroic measures were seen as worthy of debate in the con
text of dying with dignity rather than of euthanasia. There was an ass
ociated aversion to inappropriate heroic measures, which were perceive
d as prolonging death and interfering with 'dying with dignity'. The d
evelopment of a personal and moral/ethical stance (in relation to euth
anasia) was shown to be an evolving process embedded in a caring philo
sophy and emphasizing the contextual nature of providing appropriate c
are.