The relationship between preoperative assessment of tumor volume and o
ncologic adequacy of surgical margins was studies retrospectively. Our
hypothesis was that the risk of inadequate, or positive, margins woul
d rise with increasing tumor volume and that this would adversely affe
ct survival. We anticipated that limitations of surgical approaches us
ed until 1988 would be reflected in an increasing proportion of positi
ve margins with increasing tumor volume. We conducted a pilot study of
25 patients with malignant tumors of the anterolateral cranial base o
perated on at the university of Pittsburgh Center for Cranial base sur
gery between 1987 and 1988. Preoperative computed tomography assessmen
t of tumor volume was performed in all patients, and correlation betwe
en tumor volume, surgical margins, and survival was examined. Follow-u
p interval averaged 31.7 months. Twelve histologic tumor types were re
presented, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common (eight patient
s [32%]). Tumor volume ranged from 0.9 to 390 cc, with a median of 48
cc. Based on a median split of tumor volumes, patients were classified
as high volume (more than 48 cc) or low volume (less than 48 cc). Of
patients in the high volume group, 92% were found to have positive sur
gical margins, whereas only 50% of patients in the low volume group ha
d positive margins. Analysis of the effect of tumor volume and surgica
l margins on survival was limited by sample size constraints, but both
high-tumor volume and positive margins tended to reduce patient survi
val (0.07 < p 0.10).