Large marginal crown discrepancies are deleterious. Although previous
studies have examined casting seating in vitro, few have evaluated the
effects of different luting cements on in vivo seating. Hence this in
vivo study compared marginal discrepancies created by different cemen
ts on cast crowns. Tooth preparations were completed according to acce
ptable procedures on previously intact human molars that were severely
periodontally compromised and scheduled for extraction. Castings were
made by conventional techniques. The castings were randomly assigned
to the following luting agents: zinc phosphate cement, resin-modified
glass-ionomer cement, and the same resin-modified glass-ionomer cement
with a dentinal bonding agent. After 6 months the teeth were carefull
y extracted, embedded, and sectioned, and vertical and horizontal disc
repancies were measured. Analysis of variance revealed that all cement
s resulted in similar discrepancies. Vertical discrepancies were consi
derably greater than horizontal discrepancies, and the distributions o
f marginal discrepancies were skewed towards upper ranges.