Gr. Hamed et Ps. Wu, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COHESIVE STRENGTH AND TACK OF ELASTOMERS .4.CARBON-BLACK FILLED STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER, Rubber chemistry and technology, 68(2), 1995, pp. 248-258
The autohesion and cohesion of uncrosslinked SBR (gum and black-filled
) have been determined over a broad range of test temperatures and rat
es using a T-peel geometry. Peeling energies can be time-temperature s
uperposed to form mastercurves using shift factors in accord with the
WLF form. Universal constants are appropriate for the gum. While exper
imental constants were obtained for the black composition. Cohesion fo
r the gum and filled SDR increase continuously with increasing test sp
eed or reduced temperature. On the other hand, autohesion for the gum
shows an abrupt transition by decreasing at a critical reduced rate, w
hile autohesion of the filled SBR does nut exhibit the transition. The
transition is associated with a viscous-to-elastic response change wi
th Increasing Ra-T; filled SDR has reduced elasticity relative to the
gum and hence the transition is not present. By examining relative aut
ohesion, it is seen that the gum undergoes an interfacial-cohesive-int
erfacial transition response with increasing Ra-T. This is quite diffe
rent than the behavior found when peeling apart elastomer/hard substra
te bonds, such as the SBR/polyester bonds of Gent and Petrich; here, t
here is sim ply a cohesive-interfacial transition with increasing Ra-T
. For elastomer-elastomer junctions there is interpenetration and chai
n mobility in the interphase formed. At sufficiently low Ra-T, interdi
ffused chains simply slide by one another giving interfacial failure.
With increasing Ra-T entanglement couplings in the interphase become e
ffective in preventing facile flow, and, at this point, failure become
s cohesive; finally, at even higher Ra-T, with a sufficiently elastic
response, stresses apparently become concentrated at the interface and
failure proceeds there. When an elastomer is bonded to a hard, immobi
le material, the mechanism of bonding is restricted to surface site ad
sorption, This reduces elastomeric chain mobility and produces more ''
glassy'' dispersive interactions which resist separation relative to t
ile chains which are held together by ''rubbery'' dispersive forces. A
gain at sufficiently high Ra-T, with increased elasticity, failure bec
omes interfacial.