OBJECTIVE. Potential barriers to compliance with screening mammography
guidelines include the cost and inconvenience involved with undergoin
g the procedure. Workplace screening with mobile mammography is one po
ssible approach to the convenience barrier. However, fixed-facility wo
rkplace screening is a viable alternative for any company with a large
workforce in one location, This paper describes our initial experienc
e with one such fixed facility. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The facility wa
s a cooperative venture by a large pharmaceutical company and an acade
mic radiology department to provide convenient, no-cost (to the patien
t) screening mammography to employees, dependents, and retirees more t
han 40 years old. The pharmaceutical company built the facility within
its corporate headquarters and the academic radiology department prov
ided the equipment and personnel, The company was billed a fixed cost
per examination. RESULTS. In the first 22 months of operation, 4210 (o
f 4559 scheduled) screening mammograms were obtained. The mean age of
the population was 53 years old. Ninety percent of the screening mammo
grams were interpreted as negative or benign; 10% required additional
workup. Of the screened population, 62 biopsies were recommended and 6
0 were performed. Of these, 42 were benign and is malignant, The cance
r detection rate was 4.3 per 1000 (0.43%). At the time of diagnosis, s
ix patients were stage 0, 10 patients were stage I, one patient was st
age II, and one patient was stage III. Eleven of the 18 patients had m
inimal cancers. Of the patients who completed a satisfaction survey, 9
7% percent expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the screening
process and stated they would use the facility in the future. CONCLUSI
ON. A fixed facility for workplace screening mammography is a viable w
ay to provide nearly barrier-free access to high-quality mammography.
Patient acceptance is high.