THROMBOLYSIS IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - REDUCING IN-HOSPITAL TREATMENT DELAY

Citation
G. Porter et al., THROMBOLYSIS IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - REDUCING IN-HOSPITAL TREATMENT DELAY, New Zealand medical journal, 108(1002), 1995, pp. 253-254
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
00288446
Volume
108
Issue
1002
Year of publication
1995
Pages
253 - 254
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-8446(1995)108:1002<253:TIAM-R>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Aim. Thrombolytic treatment when given early in acute myocardial infar ction is beneficial. This study was initiated to firstly, document the existing time delays in the administration of thrombolysis at Aucklan d Hospital, and secondly, prospectively assess the effect of a staff e ducation programme to reduce in-hospital delay. The goal was a ''door to needle time'' of less than 30 minutes. Methods. The time delays in the administration of thrombolysis to patients with acute myocardial i nfarction admitted to the coronary care unit at Auckland Hospital were established. This was done with a retrospective chart review over a s ix month period January to June 1993. This was followed by a staff edu cation programme to fast track the management of patients eligible for thrombolysis. A prospective assessment was performed from February to May 1994 to audit the effectiveness of the programme. Results. Most o f the delay in the administration of thrombolysis occurred in the comm unity prior to arrival at hospital (median delay 2.5 hours). However t here was still. a significant delay in hospital with a median door to needle time of 59 minutes in 1993. Following the education programme i n 1994 the median door to needle time was reduced by 32% to 40 minutes (p = 0.03). The proportion of patients with a door to needle time ofl ess than 30 minutes doubled from 13% in 1993 to 27% in 1994 (p = 0.18) . Conclusion. Staff training and thrombolysis guidelines are effective in reducing in-hospital treatment delay but additional strategies may be warranted. Thrombolysis should be administered in the coronary car e unit or emergency department to avoid delay. Ongoing assessment of s tandards will be required in the general hospital setting as a quality indicator.