Many federal laws dealing with environment, safety, and health contain
language directing that certain kinds of standards be set on the basi
s of health evidence alone. That is, economic considerations are not t
o be taken into account in setting these standards. This paper present
s arguments in defense of this position and then suggests why these ar
guments are not convincing. In other words, it makes the case that reg
ulators should strive to balance economic, health, and other considera
tions for sensible policymaking.