With the increasing concern over the high cost of health care, policy
makers have incorporated economic analyses into phase III clinical tri
als as the randomized clinical trials can provide important informatio
n on the efficacy and potential cost-effectiveness of new pharmaceutic
al agents. Economic analyses of single-hospital experience during phas
e III trials of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-C
SF) as adjunct therapy for high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem
cell support found significant shortening of neutropenia with GM-CSF
at each hospital, but shortened hospitalization (and lower costs) at o
nly two of three hospitals. In this study, we added data from three ad
ditional hospitals and found that the 103 patients who received GM-CSF
had, on average, 5.7 days shorter durations of severe neutropenia tha
n the 95 patients who received placebo (p < 0.0001) and 3.4 days short
er in hospitalization (p = 0.06). However, the duration of hospitaliza
tion, the primary determinant of health care costs, was shorter for GM
-CSF patients in only four of the six centers and the duration of hosp
italization of placebo patients was shorter at the other two centers.
Careful analyses must be carried out when phase III clinical trial res
ults are used to derive estimates of cost-effectiveness of new pharmac
eutical agents. The interpretation of economic analyses of phase III c
linical trials raises issues related to the perspective of the investi
gators, study design, collection of data on resource utilization, lear
ning curve effects and generalizability of the results to other settin
gs.