Presidents often declare war against foreign enemies and win public su
pport for such initiatives. Presidents also define domestic issues, an
d citizens look to presidents to construct a domestic agenda. Although
successful in foreign applications, presidential invocations of the w
ar metaphor have been less popular domestically. One exception is the
war on drugs. Despite criticisms of drug control policies and use of t
he war metaphor to define our problems with drugs, no alternate metaph
ors have emerged to replace the bellicose perspective we apply to this
social problem. By examining the nationally televised drug war declar
ations of former presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush, I find that
the presidential perquisite to define issues and the fusion of war wi
th illness metaphors provide a familiar perspective on this complex is
sue-hence, its endurance. However, drug control policies became increa
singly bellicose during the Reagan and Bush years, making the war on d
rugs appear to be a war against American minorities. The war on drugs
may have been designed not simply to control illegal substances but al
so to help maintain an electoral coalition that endured for three pres
idential, terms.