REAPPRAISAL OF SAFETY OF ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES IN THE ELDERLY

Citation
Gp. Deenitchin et al., REAPPRAISAL OF SAFETY OF ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES IN THE ELDERLY, The American journal of surgery, 170(1), 1995, pp. 51-54
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00029610
Volume
170
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
51 - 54
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(1995)170:1<51:ROSOES>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy is the method of choice for elde rly patients with common bile duct stones, even though these patients are poor operative risks, We undertook this study to analyze the opera tive risk factors for this age group, METHODS: We compared specific pr oblems of 182 patients aged 80 years or older and 921 younger patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. RESULTS: Despite a higher frequency of periampullary diverticula in th e elderly than in the younger patients (54% versus 36%, P <0.001), the success rates of sphincterotomy were not different, The elderly patie nts required lithotripsy more often than did the younger ones (15% ver sus 4%, P <0.001), and the necessity of stenting or nasobiliary draina ge was greater in this group (9%) than in the younger group (5%, P <0. 05), This difference in the tactics between the older and younger grou ps was due to the greater number and size of stones, longer period of time for complete clearance of the common bile duct (13.5 versus 6.0 d ays, P <0.01), and a greater percentage of patients with operative ris ks (55% versus 36%, P <0.001). The elderly also had significantly grea ter overall morbidity compared with the younger patients (13% versus 7 %, P <0.005), frequency of acute cholangitis (8% versus 2%, P <0.001), and mortality (1% versus O%), CONCLUSION: These results suggest that frequent stenting or nasobiliary drainage to prevent cholangitis or pr ompt stone removal by lithotripsy would be necessary in this group of patients.