Ca. Dietl et Ch. Benoit, RADIAL GRAFT FOR CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION - TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS, The Annals of thoracic surgery, 60(1), 1995, pp. 102-110
Background. Use of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafti
ng is controversial. Methods. Between November 1999 and December 1994,
the radial artery artery graft was used in 165 patients (mean age, 63
.7 years) undergoing coronary revascularization. To prevent spasm, the
radial artery was not skeletonized, and calcium-channel blockers were
administered routinely. Results. No ischemic or functional complicati
ons occurred in the hand after harvesting of the radial artery. Only 1
patient (0.6%) sustained a perioperative myocardial infarction in an
area revascularized with a radial artery. The overall mortality was 3.
0% (5 patients), but no deaths were caused by failure of the radial ar
tery graft. During a mean follow-up of 14.0 months, angina recurred in
5 patients (3.0%), all of whom had widely patent radial artery grafts
on angiography. Radionuclide exercise studies were performed 1 year a
fter operation in 84 patients, 2 of whom (2.4%) had stress-induced def
ects in areas grafted with a radial artery. Conclusions. Perioperative
myocardial infarction, mortality, and recurrent angina usually were n
ot related to failure of the radial artery graft. Our results suggest
that the radial artery is an excellent alternative conduit for myocard
ial revascularization and may be used safety, especially in patients w
ith poor-quality or unavailable saphenous veins.