A. Casadevall et Md. Scharff, RETURN TO THE PAST - THE CASE FOR ANTIBODY-BASED THERAPIES IN INFECTIOUS-DISEASES, Clinical infectious diseases, 21(1), 1995, pp. 150-161
In the preantibiotic era, passive antibody administration (serum thera
py) aas useful for the treatment of many infectious diseases. The intr
oduction of antimicrobial chemotherapy in the 1940s led to the rapid a
bandonment of many forms of passive antibody therapy. Chemotherapy was
more effective and less toxic than antibody therapy. In this last dec
ade of the 20th century the efficacy of antimicrobial chemotherapy is
diminishing because of the rapidly escalating number of immunocompromi
sed individuals, the emergence of new pathogens, the reemergence of ol
d pathogens, and widespread development of resistance to antimicrobial
drugs. This diminishment in the effectiveness of chemotherapy has bee
n paralleled by advances in monoclonal antibody technology that have m
ade feasible the generation of human antibodies. This combination of f
actors makes passive antibody therapy an option worthy of serious cons
ideration. We propose that for every pathogen there exists an antibody
that will modify the infection to the benefit of the host. Such antib
odies are potential antimicrobial agents. Antibody-based therapies hav
e significant advantages and disadvantages relative to standard chemot
herapy. The reintroduction of antibody-based therapy would require maj
or changes in the practices of infectious disease specialists.