Gs. Richardson et al., OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF SLEEP AND ALERTNESS IN MEDICAL HOUSE STAFF AND THE IMPACT OF PROTECTED TIME FOR SLEEP, Sleep, 19(9), 1996, pp. 718-726
We studied 26 physicians in postgraduate medical training (''house sta
ff'') to objectively quantify their sleep, alertness, and psychomotor
performance while working on call. This study provided precise data on
the extent of sleep deprivation during a typical call night, the work
load factors predictive of sleep loss, and the extent to which protect
ed time for sleep within the call night can ameliorate sleep loss and
consequent daytime sleepiness. We used ambulatory EEG recording equipm
ent and a standardized computer-based performance test to monitor slee
p and alertness over the course of a 36-hour call day. Comparisons wer
e made between interns provided with 4 hours of protected time for sle
ep by a covering resident (''night-float'') and interns without such c
overage. As anticipated, we found evidence that hospital interns were
severely sleep-deprived, to an extent even greater than prior behavior
al observations have suggested. Interns in both conditions spent an av
erage of less than 5 hours (295.4 minutes) in bed attempting to sleep
and obtained an average of 3.67 hours (220.1 minutes) of sleep (range
37.4-358.4 minutes). Provision of the night-float for 4 hours did not
significantly change total sleep time (TST) (212.8 minutes covered vs.
224.9 minutes uncovered), bur sleep efficiency was significantly impr
oved (86.5% vs. 70.3%; p = 0.001). Covered interns also obtained signi
ficantly more slow-wave sleep than the uncovered interns (65.4 minutes
vs. 51.1 minutes; p = 0.05). However, measures of alertness and perfo
rmance were not significantly different between the two groups and wer
e only weakly related to TST. These data suggest that significant chro
nic sleep deprivation is relatively unaffected by sleep obtained in th
e hospital and that provision of protected time for sleep does not sig
nificantly improve TST.