Af. Schmalreck et al., AN EVALUATION OF 7 METHODS OF IN-VITRO SU SCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CLINICAL YEAST ISOLATES AGAINST FLUCONAZOLE, Mycoses, 38, 1995, pp. 55-63
Four commercially available in vitro test systems (Candifast(R), E-tes
t, Mycototal(R), Spiral-Gradient Endpoint Method), agardiffusion with
25 mu g fluconazole paper test discs and 15 mu g test tablets, and aga
rdilution were compared to the microbroth dilution method by fluconazo
le susceptibility testing of 145 clinical isolates. In addition, the c
ulture media provided or recommended by the manufacturers of the test
systems were compared to the high resolution (HR) antifungal test medi
um. With all currently available culture media growth problems (inhibi
tion or delayed growth of the clinical isolates) occurred with solid o
r semi-solid media. With minor improvements, HR medium demonstrated th
e most reproducible and comparable results (supplementation with aspar
agine and deletion of sodium hydrogen carbonate). Best correlation to
microdilution was obtained by the agardilution method (> 95% concordan
ce) followed by the spiral-gradient endpoint method (85%), Candifast(R
) (83%), Mycototal(R) (81%) and the E-test (78%). Regression analysis
demonstrated good correlation between agardiffusion and micro-/agardil
ution (r > 0.9).