M. Campos et al., A CHLAMYDIAL MAJOR OUTER-MEMBRANE PROTEIN EXTRACT AS A TRACHOMA VACCINE CANDIDATE, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 36(8), 1995, pp. 1477-1491
Purpose. As shown in infected humans and iri animal models of chlamydi
al infection, the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) of Chlamydia tra
chomatis is immunogenically potent. The purpose of this investigation
was to test in the cynomolgus monkey model of trachoma a new extract o
f MOMP as a candidate vaccine against ocular chlamydial infection. Met
hod. The nonionic detergent octyl-beta-D glucopyranoside (OGP) was use
d to extract MOMP from purified C. trachomatis (serovar C) elementary
bodies. Protective immunization with OGP-MOMP by mucosal and systemic
routes was compared in the cynomolgus monkey model of trachoma. All co
ntrol and immunized monkeys were challenged by topical application of
infectious C. trachomatis to the conjunctivae 35 days after the initia
tion of immunization. Results. Immunization with OGP-extracted MOMP su
ccessfully induced chlamydia-specific local and systemic immunity to M
OMP and to whole organism before challenge and early clearance of infe
ction by systemically immunized monkeys. Although ocular disease was n
ot significantly reduced in either immunized group compared to control
animals, the lowest clinical and microbiologic disease scores develop
ed in two animals in the mucosal group with the highest immunoglobulin
A tear antibody titers at days 0 to 14, whereas higher tear and serum
immunoglobulin G correlated with reduced disease in the systemically
immunized group.Conclusions. These data demonstrate that despite evide
nce of vigorous MOMP-specific and other chlamydia-specific serologic a
nd cell-mediated immunity, as well as anamnestic serologic responses t
o chlamydia, vaccination with OGP-MOMP was only partially protective a
gainst chlamydial ocular disease. The partial protection correlated be
st with tear immunoglobulin A responses after mucosal immunization and
with local and systemic immunoglobulin G responses after peripheral i
mmunization, suggesting that alternative chlamydial antigens may have
td be considered in future vaccine development to induce more effectiv
e protective immunity and that evaluation of efficacy must be appropri
ate to route of immunization.