B. Uziely et al., LIPOSOMAL DOXORUBICIN - ANTITUMOR-ACTIVITY AND UNIQUE TOXICITIES DURING 2 COMPLEMENTARY PHASE-I STUDIES, Journal of clinical oncology, 13(7), 1995, pp. 1777-1785
Purpose: The purpose of our studies was to define the maximal-tolerate
d dose of liposomal doxorubicin (DOX-SL; Liposome Technology Inc, Menl
o Park, CA), a doxorubicin formulation of polyethyleneglycol-coated li
posomes, characterize the toxicities associated with this formulation,
and evaluate any indication of antitumor activity within a phase I se
tting. Patients and Methods: Two separate phase I studies were conduct
ed following the initial human pharmacokinetic testing at one of the s
ites (Hadassah). The starting dose of 20 mg/m(2) at the University of
Southern California was just below the dose without toxicity in the ph
armacokinetic study. At Hadassah, the phase I starting dose was just a
bove their earlier safe single doses, 60 mg/m(2). Both studies involve
d cohorts of at least three patients and redosing every 3 to 4 weeks,
To determine the recommended dose for phase II trials, on additional l
evel of 50 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was explored, and the level of 60 mg/
m(2) every 4 weeks was expanded. Results: A total of 56 patients recei
ving 281 courses of DOX-SL was accrued and evaluated for toxicity. Han
d-foot (H-F) syndrome and stomatitis are the two main dose-limiting fa
ctors of DOX-SL. Stomatitis was dose-limiting for high single doses of
DOX-SL greater than 70 mg/m(2). Skin toxicity manifested primarily as
H-F syndrome was dose-limiting for repetitive dosing, but acceptable
at either 50 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks or 60 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks. Attenu
ation of acute subjective symp toms and lack of alopecia were generall
y observed. Patients with carcinomas of the breast, ovary, prostate, a
nd head and neck were among those showing objective antitumor response
s or improvement based, in part, on blood levels of tumor markers. Con
clusion: The toxicity profile of DOX-SL differs prominently from that
of the free drug administered by bolus or rapid infusion and with some
differences, resembles that of prolonged continuous infusion. This fi
nding, as well as the antitumor activity observed, supports wide phase
II testing of DOX-SL in solid rumors.