Sl. Henry et Kp. Galloway, LOCAL ANTIBACTERIAL THERAPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPEDIC INFECTIONS - PHARMACOKINETIC CONSIDERATIONS, Clinical pharmacokinetics, 29(1), 1995, pp. 36-45
Bone infection has long been a formidable foe of orthopaedic surgeons.
The standard method of treating osteomyelitis generally consists of i
rrigation and debridement supplemented by pre- and postoperative antib
iotics and intraoperative antimicrobial solutions. in the 1970s, Buchh
olz introduced the concept of local antibacterial therapy in the form
of antibiotic impregnated bone cement to treated infected arthroplasti
es, From this, antibiotic impregnated beads were developed to treat lo
cal infections of bone and soft tissue, The advantage of these beads c
ompared with parenteral therapy is that they deliver a high concentrat
ion of antibacterial locally while avoiding hi,oh systemic concentrati
ons, thus avoiding adverse effects that are often associated with pare
nteral antibacterial therapy. Additionally, methylmethacrylate bone ce
ment does not significantly affect the immune response of the body. Th
is makes the use of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate (PMM
A) beads highly effective either as an alternative to, or in conjuncti
on with, systemic antibiotic treatment of infected arthroplasties, and
localised bone and soft tissue infection. This article explores the i
ndications for the use of local therapy as well as any advantages or d
isadvantages it may have over systemic antibacterial treatment. Additi
onally, there are important pharmacokinetic considerations for the opt
imal use of antibacterial agents in the treatment of osteomyelitis.