H. Eriksson et al., RECOVERY FROM SEVOFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE ANESTHESIA AFTER OUTPATIENT GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPY, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 39(3), 1995, pp. 377-380
As the low blood solubility (blood gas partition coefficient 0.69) of
sevoflurane suggests a rapid emergence from anaesthesia, recovery from
sevoflurane anaesthesia was compared to isoflurane in outpatient gyna
ecological laparoscopy. Fifty ASA I or II, consenting women participat
ed in a randomised, controlled and single blind study. The patients re
ceived, after induction of anaesthesia with propofol, either sevoflura
ne or isoflurane, both with 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen, for maintenan
ce of anaesthesia. The study drug was administered at 1 MAC (end tidal
concentration 0.6% for sevoflurane and 0.5% for isoflurane) but adjus
ted in 0.5 MAC steps, if clinically indicated. Before the end of surge
ry the end tidal concentration of the study drug was reduced to 0.5 iL
MAC. Recovery assessments were made from the time anaesthetic gases w
ere discontinued. The subjects were able to open eyes in 2.3 (0.8-7.0)
min and 4.1 (2.0-6.8) min, orientate in 2.8 (1.0-6.8) min and 4.7 (2.
2-8.3) min and follow orders in 2.6 (0.7-6.8) min and 4.3 (1.2-7.3) mi
n, in the sevoflurane and isoflurane groups, respectively (P<0.05) [me
dian (range)]. Walking was achieved in 72 (24-464) min and 66 (35-134)
) min, tolerance of oral fluids in 37 (15-88) min and 35 (45-161) min
and voiding in 262 (96-459) min and 217 (52-591) min in the sevofluran
e and isoflurane groups, respectively (NS). Overall home readiness was
achieved in 281 (96-708) min after sevoflurane group and 242 (96-591)
min after isoflurane (NS). Postoperative nausea and vomiting was comm
on in both groups (55% for sevoflurane and 15% for isoflurane) and con
tributed to three subjects in the sevoflurane group and four in the is
oflurane group being admitted to hospital.