Pd. Witt et al., AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS IN EXTIRPATION OF MELOLABIAL LYMPHATIC MALFORMATIONS IN CHILDREN, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 96(1), 1995, pp. 48-57
Surgical treatment of lymphatic malformations in the nasolabial region
of children has produced disappointing results. Attempts to remove th
em through a preauricular incision have generally required a synchrono
us superficial parotidectomy in an attempt to prevent facial nerve inj
ury. However, incomplete removal with this approach is common, leading
to multiple surgeries, infections, facial nerve injury, and when paro
tidectomy is performed, a lateral facial concavity. To avoid these com
plications and still extirpate the lymphatic malformation, an alternat
ive direct external technique has been employed since 1986. A retrospe
ctive review of nine children with melolabial lymphatic malformations
so managed was undertaken to assess treatment outcome. All patients un
derwent computed tomography (CT) or, more recently, magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) scans to define the anatomic limits of the lymphatic ma
lformation and its relationship to the facial musculature. Scans diffe
rentiated localized lesions (resectable) from diffuse lesions (unresec
table). Al patients underwent direct external soft-tissue excisional d
ebulking by means of melolabial incisions with perialar and/or supra-w
hite roll extensions as needed. The mean age at time of surgery was 5.
6 years. Complications were considered minor: One patient developed a
small hematoma for which no specific treatment was necessary; four pat
ients required antibiotics for cellulitis. The mean age at follow-up w
as 5.25 years. The mean number of procedures necessary to achieve fina
l outcome was 3.25. The mean number of episodes of postoperative cellu
litis was 1.8. There was a high level of patient and parent acceptance
of facial scars. No patient required secondary scar revision. The ext
ernal approach addresses the pathology directly, removes a greater ove
rall percentage of abnormal tissue than the traditional hemirhytidecto
my approach, and avoids potential injury to the facial nerve and the d
eforming concavity resulting from parotidectomy.