The kinematic wave approximation is commonly used in the new generatio
n of so-called physically based, distributed rainfall-runoff models. H
owever, although the kinematic wave approximation is commonly accepted
for channel and experimental flows, its applicability to actual hills
lopes remains unvalidated. Because it is not possible to measure, nor
model, all of the details of the flow on any realistic surface, we use
subgrid approximations to provide an effective parameterization of th
e processes that occur on scales smaller than those that can be modell
ed. This paper explores different effective parameterizations, the dat
a required to identify the correct parameterization, and the implicati
ons of not being able to identify all of the parameters on the scale d
ependence of flood hydrology. Data from small-scale plot experiments (
100 m(2)) and large-scale catchments (1 km(2)) are used to explore the
se issues. It has been found that infiltration parameters can be adequ
ately calibrated from small-scale plots. However, it is more difficult
to calibrate the kinematic wave parameters using small-scale data alo
ne. The conveyance properties of the hillslope cross-sections are para
meterized by two kinematic wave parameters, c(r) and e(m), to yield th
e discharge Q = c(r)A(cs)(em)S(0.5) with S being the slope and A(cs) t
he cross-sectional area. It is shown that these two parameters are hig
hly correlated, particularly when inferred from small-scale data. The
surface roughness, amount of rilling and undulations of the surface al
l influence the kinematic wave parameters. The runoff response at larg
e scales is very sensitive to changes in c(r) and e(m), yet is not rea
dily apparent in small-scale data. Unfortunately, using small-scale da
ta c(r) and e(m) cannot be estimated with acceptable precision to reli
ably extrapolate to larger scales. The significance of this behaviour
is demonstrated and some possible solution strategies are discussed.