Jb. Koea et al., TOTAL-ENERGY EXPENDITURE DURING TOTAL PARENTERAL-NUTRITION - AMBULATORY PATIENTS AT HOME VERSUS PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS IN SURGICAL INTENSIVE-CARE, Surgery, 118(1), 1995, pp. 54-62
Background. To avoid the complications associated with overfeeding or
underfeeding, the energy requirements of patients receiving total pare
nteral nutrition (TPN) must be accurately prescribed. However, until r
ecently it has not been possible to directly measure the rates of tota
l energy expenditure (TEE) in. surgical patients receiving TPN. Method
s. Values for total body water and TEE in four patients with sepsis (m
ean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] score, 10)
receiving TPN in surgical intensive care unit and in four patients wi
th chronic intestinal failure receiving long-term TPN at home (HPN) ha
ve been determined by using the doubly labeled water technique. The va
lues for TEE have been compared with those of resting energy expenditu
re obtained with indirect calorimetry (REE CAL) and calculated by usin
g the Harris-Benedict equation (REE HB). Results. In both the patients
with sepsis and the patients receiving HPN the proportion of body wei
ght made up of water was normal for patient age and gender. In patient
s with sepsis the REE HB significantly (p < 0.05) underestimated the R
EE CAL (15.39 +/- 3.80 kcal/kg/day(-1) versus 31.3 +/- 1.23 kcal/kg/da
y(-1)) and was significantly less than the TEE derived by using doubly
labeled water (44.62 +/- 1.09 kcal/kg/day(-1); p < 0.001). In the amb
ulatory patients receiving HPN no difference was noted between the REE
HB and the REE CAL (18.02 +/- 0.41 kcal/kg/day(-1) versus 21.37 +/- 0
.94 kcal/kg/day(-1)). The average TEE these patients was 30.25 +/- 3.4
2 kcal/kg/day(-1), and this was significantly greater (p < 0.006) than
both REE CAL and REE HB. Conclusions. This investigation has shown th
at in patients with sepsis TEE constitutes 1.4 times the REE CAL or ap
proximately 40 kcal/kg/day, whereas in HPN patients TEE can be estimat
ed by supplying 1.4 times the REE or approximately 30 kcal/kg/day(-1).