In clinical practice it would be desirable to monitor the clinical cou
rse and outcome of thrombolytic therapy by use of non-invasive laborat
ory methods, From the test systems available, the determination of spe
cific myocardial necrosis markers seem to be at the moment of highest
clinical value, Markers of thrombin activation might indicate failure
of therapy and/or tendency for thrombotic reocclusion with all commerc
ially available fibrin specific or non-specific thrombolytic agents bu
t have failed to be of prognostic value for the individual patient or
have not been investigated in sufficient numbers of patients, No clini
cal usefulness has been found so far for determination of markers of p
lasmin activation, Accordingly, specific control parameters of thrombo
lytic therapy with rt-PA have not been shown to be useful as predictiv
e marker for clinical outcome of thrombolytic therapy in the individua
l patient with acute myocardial infarction, However, determination of
t-PA and PAI-1 plasma levels is of interest with respect to investigat
ion of pathophysiological contexts and their influence on efficacy of
thrombolysis and should, therefore, be taken into account in clinical
trials using t-PA or related substances for thrombolytic therapy.