Me. Hamel et al., ACTIVATION AND REACTIVATION POTENTIAL OF T-CELLS RESPONDING TO STAPHYLOCOCCAL-ENTEROTOXIN-B, International immunology, 7(7), 1995, pp. 1065-1077
To elucidate the parameters that lead to superantigen induced non-resp
onsiveness, an in vitro model for studying primary and secondary respo
nses to the bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB)
was established. Upon re-activation with SEB, in vitro SEB primed T ce
lls show an early proliferative response that 'quenches' in time and i
s severely impaired 3 days after re-stimulation, Despite their overall
impaired proliferative capacity and IL-2 production, these T cells ar
e able to produce IFN-gamma and to up-regulate activation markers CD69
and IL-2R alpha upon re-stimulation with SEB, demonstrating that SEB
non-responsiveness is not absolute. Rather, it reflects the inability
to mount an ongoing proliferative response upon re-stimulation with SE
B. Our results also demonstrate that SEB-induced non-responsiveness is
not simply the result of presentation in the absence of co-stimulatio
n, since presentation of SEB on highly purified dendritic cells during
the primary response did not prevent the induction of non-responsiven
ess. As previously shown, SEB induces a T(h)1 phenotype in responding
CD4(+) T cells. Skewing towards a T(h)2 phenotype by adding IL-4 and a
ntibodies to IFN-gamma did not prevent the induction of nonresponsiven
ess by SEB. Interestingly, T cells pretreated with plate-bound anti-CD
3 epsilon and anti-V(beta)8 were also non-responsive to SEB re-stimula
tion. Thus, non-responsiveness to SEB (defined here as inability to pr
oduce IL-2 and proliferate) seems to reflect an intrinsic inability of
previously activated T cells to respond to SEB, probably reflecting d
ifferences in signal transduction pathways used by naive versus previo
usly activated T cells.