K. Prasad et T. Haines, DEXAMETHASONE TREATMENT FOR ACUTE BACTERIAL-MENINGITIS - HOW STRONG IS THE EVIDENCE FOR ROUTINE USE, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 59(1), 1995, pp. 31-37
A methodological appraisal of the published randomised controlled tria
ls on the use of dexamethasone as an adjunct treatment in acute bacter
ial meningitis was carried out to examine whether the available eviden
ce is strong enough to support the routine use of the drug. Studies we
re eligible for inclusion if they were published in indexed journals a
fter 1966, written in English, and were randomised controlled trials w
ith dexamethasone as adjunct to antimicrobials in patients with acute
bacterial meningitis. All studies were extracted and their adherence t
o eight methodological principles was graded as adequate, inadequate,
or unclear. A sensitivity analysis was done to examine the robustness
of the conclusions. Seven studies met the eligibility criteria. No rep
ort adhered to all the principles. Major threats to validity of the co
nclusions included potential bias in analysis in all the studies, and
lack of adjustment for baseline imbalances in four. Inadequate reporti
ng of adverse effects hindered risk-benefit analysis. Sensitivity anal
ysis showed that the numbers of patients withdrawn from analysis were
enough to invalidate the conclusions. It is concluded that the availab
le evidence is not strong enough to support a routine use of dexametha
sone in acute bacterial meningitis. Further research is needed to dete
rmine the effect of a policy to use dexamethasone early in the managem
ent of suspected acute bacterial meningitis. Future studies should ado
pt a pragmatic approach, be methodologically rigorous, and meticulousl
y measure the risk as well as the benefit of this policy.