OBJECTIVE The measurement of serum immunoreactive IGFBP-3 levels has b
een proposed as a screening test to identify children with growth horm
one deficiency (GHD). We tested the sensitivity and specificity of the
IGFBP-3 assessment in comparison with the measurement of IGF-I. DESIG
N We assessed the IGFBP-3 and IGF-I circulating levels in normal subje
cts and patients with GHD or idiopathic short stature (ISS). PATIENTS
Eighty-two normal subjects, 16 GHD, and 10 children with ISS were stud
ied. Controls were divided into three age groups: group A, 1-4 years (
n = 16); group B, 5-9 years (n = 35), and group C, 10-14 years (n = 31
). MEASUREMENTS All subjects underwent standard anthropometry. In shor
t patients, GH secretory status was assessed by clonidine and arginine
stimulation tests. IGFBP-3 and IGF-I circulating levels were measured
by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS IGFBP-3 and IGF-I levels were closely re
lated (r = 0.51, P < 0.0001) and IGFBP-3 was less age dependent than I
GF-I (r = 0.57, P < 0.02 vs r = 0.64, P = 0.0001). Sensitivity (true p
ositive ratio) and specificity (true negative ratio) of IGFBP-3 measur
ement were 50 and 92% respectively, whereas sensitivity and specificit
y of IGF-I assessment were 75 and 90% respectively. Below the age of 5
years, sensitivity was 20% for IGFBP-3 and 40% for IGF-I; specificity
was 94% for IGFBP-3 and 88% for IGF-I. CONCLUSIONS IGFBP-3 measuremen
t had poor sensitivity in detecting growth hormone deficient patients,
offering no diagnostic advantage over IGF-I, even in the first years
of life, although, due to the high specificity, the finding of subnorm
al levels of IGFBP-3 was strongly suggestive of growth hormone deficie
ncy. The presence of low IGFBP-3 and IGF-I levels in a short child wit
h normal on response to provocative tests should prompt further invest
igations, such as the determination of spontaneous GH secretion or ass
essment of the GH binding proteins together with an IGF-I and/or IGFBP
-3 generation test, in order to identify neurosecretory dysfunction or
GH receptor deficiency. Finally, we believe that there is no definiti
ve test for diagnosing or excluding growth hormone deficiency and deta
iled analysis of the results of endocrine tests, clinical findings and
other laboratory and radiological information is necessary to maximiz
e diagnostic accuracy.