THE EFFICACY OF BACILLUS-CALMETTE-GUERIN VACCINATION OF NEWBORNS AND INFANTS IN THE PREVENTION OF TUBERCULOSIS - METAANALYSES OF THE PUBLISHED LITERATURE
Ga. Colditz et al., THE EFFICACY OF BACILLUS-CALMETTE-GUERIN VACCINATION OF NEWBORNS AND INFANTS IN THE PREVENTION OF TUBERCULOSIS - METAANALYSES OF THE PUBLISHED LITERATURE, Pediatrics, 96(1), 1995, pp. 29-35
Objective. To quantify the efficacy of vaccination of infants with bac
illus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) against tuberculosis. Data sources. MEDLIN
E with index terms BCG vaccine, tuberculosis, and human; lists of all
known studies provided by experts at the Centers for Disease Control a
nd Prevention, the World Health Organization, and other organizations.
Study selection. A total of 1264 articles and abstracts were reviewed
for details on BCG vaccination, the availability of concurrent vaccin
ated and unvaccinated groups, and a tuberculosis outcome. Seventy arti
cles were reviewed in depth for method of vaccine allocation used to c
reate comparable groups, age at vaccination of study participants, com
parability of surveillance and follow-up of recipient and concurrent c
ontrol groups in trials, an appropriately defined control group in cas
e-control studies, and outcome measures (tuberculosis cases and/or dea
ths). Five prospective trials and eleven case-control studies of vacci
nation during infancy were included in the present analyses. Data extr
action. We recorded study design, age range of study population, numbe
r of patients enrolled, efficacy of vaccine, location of the study, an
d a series of items to assess the potential for bias in study design,
follow-up, and diagnosis. We extracted or computed vaccine efficacy by
years since vaccination wherever possible. At least two readers indep
endently extracted data and evaluated data validity. Data synthesis. T
he relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) for tuberculosis in vaccinate
d versus unvaccinated infants was the measure of vaccine efficacy anal
yzed. A random-effects method estimated a weighted average RR or OR fr
om data extracted from the trials and case-control studies. The protec
tive effect was then computed by 1-RR or 1-OR, Overall, the protective
effect of vaccination against cases of tuberculosis was 0.74 (95% con
fidence interval [95% CI], 0.62 to 0.83) when estimated from four rand
omized controlled trials, and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.64) when estimat
ed from nine case-control studies. Five trials reporting deaths from t
uberculosis showed a BCG protective effect of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.
86), five studies reporting on meningitis showed a protective effect o
f 0.64 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.82), and three studies of disseminated tuber
culosis showed a protective effect of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.88). Thr
ee case-control studies included separate results for laboratory-confi
rmed cases of tuberculosis. These studies documented a protective effe
ct of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93). In a random-effects regression mode
l of the nine case-control studies, study validity score explained 15%
of the heterogeneity among study-estimated protective effects, sugges
ting that better studies reported greater efficacy. Three trials and s
ix case-control studies provided some age-specific information that al
lowed us to examine the duration of BCG efficacy. Most of this evidenc
e suggested that BCG efficacy may persist through 10 years after infan
t vaccination. Conclusion. BCG vaccination of newborns and infants sig
nificantly reduces the risk of tuberculosis-by over 50%, on average. P
rotection has been observed across many populations, study designs, an
d forms of tuberculosis. Rates of protection against cases that are co
nfirmed by laboratory tests, reflecting reduced error in disease class
ification and consequently more accurate estimates of BCG efficacy, ar
e highest at 83%.