El. Gibson et al., DISGUISED PROTEIN IN LUNCH AFTER LOW-PROTEIN BREAKFAST CONDITIONS FOOD-FLAVOR PREFERENCES DEPENDENT ON RECENT LACK OF PROTEIN-INTAKE, Physiology & behavior, 58(2), 1995, pp. 363-371
As in the conditioning of appetite for protein in the rat, human prefe
rence for and intake of a food at lunch was increased when the flavor
of that food was paired with an adequate supply of protein, following
a breakfast lacking in protein. Men and women rated their preferences
for two flavors in tasted foods (soup and cornflour dessert) on test d
ays before and after a day when one flavor was eaten in very low prote
in food and another day with a different flavor eaten in food containi
ng protein, but with minimal sensory differences between these foods.
Subjects given a low-protein drink preload preferred the protein-paire
d flavor, while those receiving a high-protein drink did not. In a sec
ond experiment, preferences were measured by intake as well as ratings
, and the difference in amount of protein between high- and low-protei
n lunches was increased. By both measures, relative preference for hig
h-protein-paired dessert flavors increased from before to after pairin
g. The increase in intake preference ratio for the protein-paired flav
or was abolished by a high-protein preload. Thus, people have a learni
ng mechanism whereby a lack in protein intake comes to cue the selecti
on of protein-rich foods that are not known to be such, and/or loading
with protein might trigger avoidance specifically of a high-protein d
iet.