Da. Holdway et al., SHORT REVIEW OF SELECTED FISH BIOMARKERS OF XENOBIOTIC EXPOSURE WITH AN EXAMPLE USING FISH HEPATIC MIXED-FUNCTION OXIDASE, Australian journal of ecology, 20(1), 1995, pp. 34-44
One group of biological tools that are useful for monitoring exposure
to xenobiotics (and hence water quality) have been collectively referr
ed to as biomarkers and are defined in this paper as any biochemical,
histological and/or physiological alterations or manifestations of str
ess. Biomarkers within an aquatic toxicological context generally repr
esent biological responses of individual organisms to xenobiotic expos
ure (i.e. responses at the whole organism level of biological organiza
tion) These include among others, enzyme alterations, bile metabolites
, RNA/DNA ratio, adenylate energy charge, skeletal abnormalities, immu
ne dysfunction, behavioural changes and histopathological lesions. Bio
markers can act as effective early warning sentinels ro ensure the pro
tection of the integrity of whole ecosystems, including freshwater and
This paper briefly reviews a selection of fish biomarkers of xenobiot
ic chemical exposure and marine ecosystems discusses their respective
strengths and limitations for use in biomonitoring. An example of the
the application oi fish mixed-function Oxidase (MFO) and cytochrome P-
LSO as biomarkers of chemical exposure in Port Phillip Bay is provided
it is concluded that judicious application oi biomarkers such as MFO
in association with an understanding of the underlying causal mechanis
ms of induction and toxicity, will contribute to the successful predic
tion of biological effects of xenobiotic exposure on fish population h
ealth.