Fish provide powerful tools for assessing aquatic environments. Three
attributes are especially significant: the sensitivity of fish to most
forms of human disturbance, their usefulness at all levels of biologi
cal organization and the favourable benefit-to-cost ratio of fish asse
ssment programmes. Fish can be used as indicators over wide temporal a
nd spatial ranges. Because they cover all trophic levels of consumer e
cology, fish can effectively integrate the whole range of ecological p
rocesses in waterways. Fish have been used in many different roles for
assessing river health and monitoring responses to remedial managemen
t. Three of these applications appear to have particular value for man
agement of Australian rivers: (i) automated systems monitoring fish ve
ntilation can provide sensitive, broad-spectrum and continuous sensing
of water quality to protect receiving waters or water-supply intakes;
(ii) programmes collecting routine data on commercial or recreational
fisheries can be designed and analysed so as to isolate confounding e
ffects due to fishery-specific factors and, hence, used to detect and
monitor environmental change on large scales; (iii) the Index of Bioti
c Integrity (IBT) can be modified to suit Australian conditions and fi
sh communities to meet the important need for a predictive model of aq
uatic environmental quality. The IBI is a quantitative biological tool
with a strong ecological foundation that integrates attributes from s
everal levels of ecosystem organization. Examples of the use of IBI el
sewhere suggest its robustness, flexibility and sensitivity can cope e
ffectively with the low diversity of the Australian fish fauna and the
dominance of ecological generalists. A provisional structure is sugge
sted for a test of the IBI in four riverine regions of New South Wales
.