To. Lipman, BACTERIAL TRANSLOCATION AND ENTERAL NUTRITION IN HUMANS - AN OUTSIDERLOOKS IN, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 19(2), 1995, pp. 156-165
Purpose: To assess the literature documenting the existence of bacteri
al translocation in humans, the effects of enteral nutrition on bacter
ial translocation in humans, and the hypothesis that enteral nutrition
prevents bacterial translocation in humans. Data Identification: Sour
ces included Medline search, references from review articicles, and re
ferences from animal and human studies. Study selection: The goal was
to include all animal and human studies directly addressing questions
of bacterial translocation and nutritional status or nutritional suppo
rt. Data Extraction. An attempt was made to briefly summarize methodol
ogy and findings of relevent studies. No general attempt was made to a
ssess quality of individual studies. Results of Data Synthesis: Bacter
ial translocation is a well documented phenomenon in animal models. St
arvation and malnutrition of themselves do not induce bacterial transl
ocation, but may facilitate translocation in the presence of other sys
temic insults. Parenteral nutrition and many forms of enteral nutritio
n may induce and/or facilitate bacterial translocation. Chow and certa
in fiber sources seem protective. Moderate direct and several Lines of
indirect evidence support the existence of bacterial translocation in
humans. There is no direct evidence and questionable indirect evidenc
e suggesting that enteral nutrition prevents or modifies bacterial tra
nslocation in humans. Conclusions: The hypothesis relating enteral nut
rition and bacterial translocation in critically ill patients remains
attractive, but unproven.