DIFFERENCES IN PUP BIRTH-WEIGHT, PUP VARIABILITY WITHIN LITTERS, AND DAM WEIGHT OF MICE SELECTED FOR ALTERNATIVE CRITERIA TO INCREASE LITTER SIZE

Citation
Maj. Vanengelen et al., DIFFERENCES IN PUP BIRTH-WEIGHT, PUP VARIABILITY WITHIN LITTERS, AND DAM WEIGHT OF MICE SELECTED FOR ALTERNATIVE CRITERIA TO INCREASE LITTER SIZE, Journal of animal science, 73(7), 1995, pp. 1948-1953
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
Journal title
ISSN journal
00218812
Volume
73
Issue
7
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1948 - 1953
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(1995)73:7<1948:DIPBPV>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Selection for litter size had been practiced for 21 generations and re laxed selection for 13 generations in mice. Three replicates were used with four selection criteria: index of components (ovulation rate and ova success), uterine capacity, litter size, and an unselected contro l. Especially with selection for litter size and the index relative to the control, number of pups born had increased, and differences also occurred in mating weight. Dams of the three replicates and their litt ers were used to evaluate the effects of accumulated selection on pup birth weight, variability in weight of littermates, and dam's weight a t mating and after littering. Total number born, number born alive, nu mber of males, and number of females were also recorded and studied. M ean pup birth weight did not differ among the criteria; however, varia bility among littermates in pup weight tended to differ among criteria of selection. Regressions for pup weight and within-litter standard d eviation of pup weight on number born were small and negative but sign ificant (P < .001). The distribution of pup weight within litter was n ormal for 77.2% of the litters, with no differences among the criteria . The difference between weight of male and weight of female pups was significant (P < .001); overall males were 2.5% heavier than females. There was a difference (P < .02) among criteria in mating weight and l ittering weight; however, the maternal weight gain between mating and littering was not different among criteria. Number born differed (P < .003) among the criteria, but there was no significant difference amon g criteria in numbers of males and females. Selection for larger litte rs did not have a large effect on the mean or variability within litte r for pup birth weight.