M. Crowe et al., CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGIC FEATURES OF AN OUTBREAK OF ACINETOBACTER INFECTION IN AN INTENSIVE THERAPY UNIT, Journal of Medical Microbiology, 43(1), 1995, pp. 55-62
Sporadic examples of infection with multi-resistant Acinetobacter spp.
have occurred in Nottingham hospitals since at least 1977, punctuated
by more prolonged outbreaks involving larger numbers of patients, par
ticularly those confined to the intensive therapy unit (ITU) with seve
re underlying disease. In the most recent outbreak, 11 patients were i
nfected with multi-resistant Acinetobacter strains and 26 patients wer
e colonised. Four of the infected patients died directly or indirectly
from infection with multi-resistant Acinetobacter spp., either while
in the ITU or after discharge to a general ward. The mean interval fro
m admission to the first isolation of a multi-resistant Acinetobacter
strain was 6.7 and 12.1 days in the infected and colonised groups, res
pectively. Multi-resistant Acinetobacter strains were isolated most fr
equently from the respiratory tract, and eight patients had probable o
r suspected pneumonia caused by a multi-resistant Acinetobacter sp. Al
l infected patients were treated with imipenem, with or without an ami
noglycoside, except one patient who died before a diagnosis of acineto
bacter infection was confirmed. Multi-resistant Acinetobacter spp. wer
e isolated from various environmental sites in the ITU, and patient an
d environmental isolates were found to be related closely by biotyping
, antibiograms, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of chromosomal finger
prints and ribotyping. The outbreak was controlled ultimately by trans
fer of infected or colonised patients to an isolation cubicle, cohort
nursing, emphasis on the importance of hand washing before and after p
atient contact and when handling case notes, and the use of disposable
aprons and gowns during patient contact. These measures were combined
with closure of the ITU for decontamination purposes on two separate
occasions. Continued surveillance of ITU patients and occasional envir
onmental sampling has proved to be important in preventing and control
ling subsequent outbreaks of infection by this increasingly important
nosocomial pathogen.