J.G. and D.E. are nonfluent aphasic patients who appear to have select
ive problems with abstract words on a variety of standard tests. Such
a pattern would normally be interpreted as indicating a central semant
ic deficit for abstract words. The authors show that this is not the c
ase by means of a semantic priming task, which tests for implicit know
ledge of the meanings of abstract and concrete words. Spoken word pair
s that were either abstract or concrete synonyms (e.g., street-road or
luck-chance) were presented, and it was found that both patients show
ed priming for the abstract and concrete pairs. The researchers follow
ed up by asking the patients to produce definitions to spoken abstract
and concrete words; these definitions were also normal. The priming a
nd definition data suggest that the semantic representations of abstra
ct words in these patients were relatively unimpaired. The researchers
found that the patients have problems only with spoken abstract words
in just those tasks where normal controls also have difficulty. In co
ntrast, they clearly have deficits in reading abstract words aloud, wh
ich may be due to problems with output phonology. The implications of
these data for claims concerning hemispheric differences in the repres
entation of abstract and concrete words are discussed.