Rr. White et Jmp. Smith, INFECTION-CONTROL IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - RESULTS OF A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY, Journal of public health medicine, 17(2), 1995, pp. 146-149
Background Infection control is an important aspect of quality of care
. General practitioners (GPs) have a high throughput of patients, some
attending because of a communicable disease, others for investigation
s or minor operations. This situation provides an opportunity for the
spread of infections. This study looked at the development of practice
policies on infection control and the need for further information an
d guidelines. Methods A postal questionnaire was sent to 117 practices
in a single Family Health Services Authority. The questionnaire conta
ined sections to be completed by a GP and a practice nurse in each sur
gery. Results A response rate of 74.5 per cent was obtained. Of the pr
actices replying, 85 per cent did not have a written infection control
policy. Sterilization of instruments was carried out in over 90 per c
ent of surgeries. Autoclaves were used in almost four-fifths of these
practices; most did not have any written procedures covering their use
. Few practices provided information on procedures for infected patien
ts or staff. A third of practices did not have a needlestick policy, a
nd sharps incidents were not recorded in 42 per cent of surgeries. Thr
ee-quarters of practices said that they would welcome guidelines on in
fection control. Half of the practice nurses thought that more trainin
g on infection control was required. Conclusions The need for more tra
ining and the implications of the information from the study on the de
velopment and implementation of guidelines are discussed. Recommendati
ons are made which aim to increase the awareness of this issue by mean
s of guidelines and training focused on practice nurses.