CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGIC PATTERN OF LONG-STAY INPATIENTS - AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PROVISION OF OUT-REACH COMMUNITY-SERVICES IN SAUDI-ARABIA

Citation
S. Alshammari et al., CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGIC PATTERN OF LONG-STAY INPATIENTS - AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PROVISION OF OUT-REACH COMMUNITY-SERVICES IN SAUDI-ARABIA, Journal of public health medicine, 17(2), 1995, pp. 179-186
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
09574832
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
179 - 186
Database
ISI
SICI code
0957-4832(1995)17:2<179:CAEPOL>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study was to find out the clinical and epidemiological pattern of long-stay in-patients. Methods: A cross -sectional survey of long-stay patients in Ministry of Health general hospitals was conducted during the period January-June 1993. A trained research team which consisted of a physician, a nurse, social workers and medical record officers completed a pre-designed data form and in terviewed treating teams, patients and their relatives. The data form consisted of sociodemographic data of patients, their duration of stay , and their clinical, social and psychological characteristics. The do ctors', patients', their relatives' perceptions and their preferences about the place of care (hospital or home) plus the geographical locat ion of the hospitals involved were also recorded. Results: Of the 1194 patients, 55 per cent came from either the central or southern region s. Male patients represent 65.2 per cent and the elderly (> 60 years o f age) 41.6 per cent. Multiple pathologies were found in 50.9 per cent and special signs and symptoms, e.g. incontinence, were found in 59 p er cent. The medical team felt that 54.1 per cent of all patients did not need nursing or required only routine nursing care. Treating docto rs thought that 16.2 per cent of patients did not need admission and t hat a further 54.8 per cent could be cared for in the patient's home. However, 47.5 per cent of patients preferred to stay in hospital, and 60.6 per cent of their relatives preferred them to remain in hospital. Conclusions: There is a need to plan for more cost-effective faciliti es for these patients. Any proposed health services will have to be cu lturally acceptable so as to encourage patients and relatives to utili ze them.