In addition to modulatory roles concerning bodily functions, sleep is
assumed to play a main processing role with regard to newly acquired n
eural information. Elaboration of memory traces acquired during the wa
king period is assumed to require two sequential steps taking place du
ring slow wave sleep (SWS) and eventually during paradoxical sleep (PS
). This view is suggested by several considerations, not the least of
which concerns the natural sequence of appearance of SWS and PS in the
adult animal. While the involvement of PS in memory processing is wel
l documented, the involvement of SWS is supported by the results of ba
seline and post-trial EEG analyses carried out in rats trained for a t
wo-way active avoidance task or a spatial habituation task. Together w
ith control analyses, these data indicate that the marked increase in
the average duration of post-trial SWS episodes does not reflect the o
utcome of non-specific contingent factors, such as sleep loss or stres
s, but is related to memory processing events. Several considerations
have furthermore led to the proposal that, during SWS, after a prelimi
nary selection step, the first processing operation consists in the we
akening of non-adaptative memory traces. The remaining memory traces w
ould then be stored again under a better configuration during the ensu
ing PS episode. This view is in agreement with several relevant featur
es of sleep, including the EEG waveforms prevailing during SWS and PS,
as well as the ontogenetic sequence of appearance of SWS and PS. Some
theoretical considerations on the role of sleep are also in agreement
with the sequential hypothesis. More recent data indicate that the le
arning capacity of rats is correlated with several baseline EEG featur
es of sleep and wakefulness. They include the average duration of PS e
pisodes and of SWS episodes followed by wakefulness (longer in fast le
arning rats), and the waking EEG power spectrum of fast learning rats
whose output is more balanced in the frequency range below 10 Hz than
in slow learning and in non-learning rats. Additional EEG data suggest
that fast learning rats may accomplish 'on line' processing of newly
acquired information according to a sequence of events not dissimilar
from the one proposed by the sequential hypotesis.