THE IMMUNIZATION OF CHILDREN ENROLLED IN THE SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL FOOD PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN (WIC) - THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT STRATEGIES
Gs. Birkhead et al., THE IMMUNIZATION OF CHILDREN ENROLLED IN THE SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL FOOD PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN (WIC) - THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT STRATEGIES, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 274(4), 1995, pp. 312-316
Objective.-To assess the impact of different interventions to increase
measles vaccination coverage among preschool children enrolled in the
Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (W
IC). Design.-Public health intervention trial. Setting.-Six volunteer
WIC sites in New York City. Study Participants.-Children aged 12 to 59
months presenting for WIC certification between April 1 and September
30, 1991, who were eligible for measles vaccination. Interventions.-T
wo WIC sites were assigned at random to one of three immunization stra
tegies: (1) escort: child was escorted to a nearby pediatric clinic fo
r immunization; (2) voucher incentive: the family returned monthly, ra
ther than every 2 months, to pick up WIC food vouchers until the child
was immunized; or (3) referral: the family was passively referred for
immunization. Main Outcome Measure.-Proportion of eligible children r
eceiving measles vaccination. Results.-Of children eligible for measle
s immunization, 74% (618/836) were immunized. Children at escort sites
were 5.5 times (relative risk [RR]=5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI],
3.7 to 8.1) and those at voucher incentive sites were 2.9 times (RR=2
.9; 95% CI, 1,9 to 4.5) more likely to be immunized than children at r
eferral sites. Children were immunized more rapidly at escort sites (m
edian, 14 days) and voucher incentive sites (median, 26 days) than at
referral sites (median, 45 days; P<.001). Conclusions.-Both escort and
voucher incentive models resulted in more children being immunized mo
re rapidly than passive referral. Because of ease of administration, v
oucher incentives may be a more suitable immunization intervention for
use at WIC sites, with addition of escort where feasible.