Dr. Hirsch et al., PREVALENCE OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS AMONG PATIENTS IN MEDICAL INTENSIVE GALE, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 274(4), 1995, pp. 335-337
Objective.-To determine the frequency of deep venous thrombosis (DVT)
in medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients. Design.-Prospective ul
trasound case series. Setting.-An MICU in a large tertiary care hospit
al in Boston, Mass. Subjects.-Patients older than 18 years of age admi
tted to the MICU with an anticipated stay of more than 48 hours. Main
Outcome Measure.-Deep venous thrombosis as detected by ultrasonography
with color Doppler imaging performed twice weekly in the MICU and onc
e within 1 week of discharge from the MICU. Results.-Deep venous throm
bosis was detected in 33% (95% confidence interval, 24% to 43%) of 100
eligible patients during the 8-month study period. Forty-eight percen
t (16/33) were proximal lower extremity DVT, and 15% (5/33) were upper
extremity DVT associated with central venous catheters, with one pati
ent having both upper and proximal lower extremity DVT. Ultrasound exa
mination results led to inferior vena cava filter placement in three p
atients, initiation of full-dose anticoagulation in four patients, ini
tiation or continuation of low-dose subcutaneous heparin in 10 patient
s, follow-up ultrasound studies in three patients, central line remova
l in one patient, and no intervention in 10 patients due to active ble
eding, prior filter, or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Two patients
remained anticoagulated for other reasons. In this series, there was
no difference in age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis of cancer, re
cent surgery, duration of hospitalization prior to DVT detection, and
DVT prophylaxis between patients with DVT and those without. Conclusio
ns.-An unexpectedly high rate of DVT was detected by ultrasound in the
se MICU patients despite prophylaxis in 61%. Traditionally recognized
DVT risk factors failed to identify patients who developed DVT. Routin
e ultrasound surveillance or more intensive prophylaxis regimens may b
e warranted in this patient population if these DVT rates are confirme
d in other settings.