S. Aliau et al., THE EFFECT OF FREE DNA ON THE INTERACTIONS OF THE ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR BOUND TO HORMONE, PARTIAL ANTAGONIST OR PURE ANTAGONIST WITH TARGET DNA, European journal of biochemistry, 231(1), 1995, pp. 204-213
Interactions between the lamb uterine estrogen receptor occupied by es
tradiol, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (a non-steroidal partial estrogen antagoni
st) or ICI 164,384 (a steroidal pure estrogen antagonist), and the vit
ellogenin A2 estrogen-response element (vit ERE) were compared using a
biotinylated 25-base all-palindromic double-stranded oligonucleotide,
containing vit ERE (b-ERE), which allowed isolation of the b-ERE . re
ceptor . [H-3]ligand assembly on streptavidin-Sepharose. The results o
f saturation analyses of the three receptor . [H-3]ligand complexes by
increasing amounts of b-ERE were quite similar for the proportion of
complexes able to interact with b-ERE (which varied from 30% to 65% ac
cording to experiments) and for the equilibrium dissociation constant
[K-d (0 degrees C) approximate to 1.2 nM, assuming that the receptor i
nteracted as a dimer with b-ERE]. With each ligand, receptor binding t
o ERE did not change the rate of ligand dissociation from the receptor
at 20 degrees C. The rate of estrogen receptor dissociation from b-ER
E, measured at 20 degrees C in the presence of a given concentration o
f ERE, did not vary according to the ligand bound to the receptor; how
ever, this dissociation rate increased linearly over the ERE concentra
tion range (0.5-10 mu M). The experimental rate constant (k(_)) of est
rogen receptor dissociation from b-ERE appeared to be the sum of the b
asal dissociation-rate constant (k(-)(o) approximate to 0.011 min(-1))
, corresponding to spontaneous dissociation which would occur in the a
bsence of ERE, and of the ERE-induced dissociation-rate constant, prop
ortional to the used concentration of ERE (k(-)(i) approximate to 4500
C(ERE)M(-1) min(-1), where C-ERE is the molar concentration of ERE).
Non-target DNA also induced receptor dissociation from b-ERE, but its
efficiency was 6-10-fold lower than that of ERE. We conclude that, the
two antiestrogens are as efficient as estradiol in promoting estrogen
receptor binding to a single vit ERE; the low or nil ability of antie
strogens to induce estrogenic responses is probably not linked with th
e receptor DNA-binding step; DNA binding does not seem to affect the c
onformation of the filled hormone-binding site of the receptor at 20 d
egrees C, interactions of receptor dimers with DNA seems to proceed by
direct transfer of receptor dimers between DNA strands.