Jm. Davy et al., VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION AND DEFIBRILLATI ON - ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL BASES AND CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 88, 1995, pp. 25-31
During sinus rhythm, the successive responses to the application of el
ectrical stimuli of increasing intensity during the vulnerable period
are cardiac stimulations followed by repetitive ventricular responses
and then ventricular fibrillation. An impulse of even greater intensit
y is not followed by ventricular fibrillation (shock at the upper limi
t of vulnerability) suggesting that defibrillatory shock is effective
only when it does not reinduce fibrillation. Two other hypotheses are
also proposed in fibrillation, that of critical mass and that of exten
sion of the refractory periods, in particular after biphasic shocks. C
linically, the measurement of the threshold of defibrillation is diffi
cult as it is a random process which does not obey the all or nothing
principle. Ideally, a graph of efficacy versus energy should be constr
ucted but this is only possible under experimental conditions. The eff
ects of different antiarrhythmic drugs have been studied in this manne
r; in general, the sodium channel blockers improve the energies of def
ibrillation.