COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY, SAFETY AND COST OF CEFIXIME, CEFTRIAXONE AND AZTREONAM IN THE TREATMENT OF MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT SALMONELLA-TYPHISEPTICEMIA IN CHILDREN
Ni. Girgis et al., COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY, SAFETY AND COST OF CEFIXIME, CEFTRIAXONE AND AZTREONAM IN THE TREATMENT OF MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT SALMONELLA-TYPHISEPTICEMIA IN CHILDREN, The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 14(7), 1995, pp. 603-605
An increase in the incidence of Salmonella typhi strains resistant to
chloramphenicol, ampicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole causing
enteric fever in Egyptian children stimulated the evaluation of altern
ative drugs. Children with positive blood cultures were treated with c
efixime, ceftriaxone or aztreonam, and the efficacy, safety and cost o
f these regimens were evaluated and compared. Cefixime (7.5 mg/kg) was
given orally twice daily to 50 children for 14 days, ceftriaxone (50
to 70 mg/kg) was given im once daily for 5 days to 43 children and azt
reonam (50 to 70 mg/kg) was given im every 8 hours for 7 days to 31 ch
ildren. Children in the 3 groups were comparable with regard to age, s
ex, duration and severity of illness before admission. All children we
re cured. A significant difference (P < 0.05) in duration of treatment
before becoming afebrile seemed to favor ceftriaxone (3.9 days) over
aztreonam (5.5 days) and cefixime (5.3 days), During the 4-week follow
-up period relapses occurred in 3 (6%) children in the cefixime group,
in 2 (5%) in the ceftriaxone group and in 2 (6%) in the aztreonam gro
up. Safety and efficacy were comparable for all 3 drugs. Ceftriaxone w
as most cost-effective on an inpatient basis, because of a more rapid
clinical cure, and cefixime was the most cost-effective on an outpatie
nt basis, because of drug cost.