Rm. Stagg et Rf. Addison, AN INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON OF MEASUREMENTS OF ETHOXYRESORUFIN O-DE-ETHYLASE ACTIVITY IN DAB (LIMANDA-LIMANDA) LIVER, Marine environmental research, 40(1), 1995, pp. 93-108
Methods used in ten laboratories for estimating resorufin concentratio
ns, ethoxyresorufin O-de-ethylase (EROD) activity and protein concentr
ations were compared during a practical workshop. The purity of resoru
fin standards used by participants in their own laboratories (estimate
d from molar absorbance measurements) was highly variable and ranged f
rom 18% to (apparently) > 100%. Estimates of the resorufin concentrati
ons in two 'unknown' solutions analysed by participants approximately
covered a 6-fold range, but when these estimates were corrected for th
e variation in the purity of the standards used this range narrowed to
(approximately) a 2-fold range. Estimates of protein concentration va
ried over a 2-fold range depending on the choice of method and standar
d; this variation was not reduced when all participants used a common
method, although this may reflect lack of familiarity with the method
chosen. EROD activity measured under different conditions reflecting t
he participants' choice of methods (and normalized to sample volume to
eliminate the effects of variance in protein determinations) was very
variable: the SD of the measurements was almost equal to the mean val
ue. This was greatly reduced (SD became < 20% of the mean value) when
all participants used a common method. If the purity of standard resor
ufin is controlled and if investigators agree on a set of standard con
ditions for the measurement of EROD, data from different laboratories
could be compared with reasonable success.